When Andrzej Wajda’s film “Katyń"
was shown in Slovenia this spring, first in cinemas and then on public
television, it aroused enormous audience interest but was met with almost
complete silence in the media. Slovenian public opinion is tired of the issue
of post-war mass murder and the seemingly endless discoveries of mass graves.
The film advertisements talked of exposing „Europe’s greatest lie of the
century“ and of „the Polish nation’s profound trauma“. After the screening a number of
film critics analyzed the film’s aesthetic values and discussed its narrative
techniques yet nobody took notice of the universal message of this horrific
film, one that has a direct bearing on the trauma of the Slovene nation. And since some of the organizers of the
domestic mass murders have graduated from Moscow‘s Dzerzhinsky academy, it is
no wonder that the organization and methodology of their crimes bore an uncanny
resemblance to what we see in the closing scenes of Wajda’s film. Nobody
noticed or wished to notice that in 1945, at a time when Yugoslavia’s
communists were still loyal to Stalin it was, according to information currently
available, the same ideological blindness of the Moscow graduates that resulted
in the murders of some 4,000 members of the so-called territorial army and many
civilians, so-called „counter-revolutionaries“, including many women.
What made the media response even more peculiar is that
hardly a year has passed since a shocking discovery in the abandoned mines
near Celje: behind concrete and brick walls, meant to conceal this pointless
crime forever, lay around a thousand mummified bodies of murdered people. And
Huda Jama [„the Evil Cave“ as this location is called], is only one of many
mass graves the government committee for investigating post-war crimes has
discovered so far.
This is one narrative line in a story that is
practically unknown outside Slovenia, a country that enjoys the status of being
a member of the European Union. Beneath the surface of Slovenia’s „success
story“ – the story of a country
that emerged from the disintegration of communist Yugoslavia without getting
entangled in the bloody conflict that ravaged the Balkans in the 1990s, managing
to integrate its economy and politics fairly quickly into European democratic
structures – there is a hidden a legacy that Slovenians are quite familiar
with today although until twenty years ago it was a strictly guarded state
secret. But even now that they know about it they prefer to remain silent. It
is the story of horrific crimes committed after the end of World War II, when
the communist country took power by „disposing of“ – this accountancy term has
been a staple of both Stalinist and Nazi terminology – its political
opponents, in particular the territorial army and along with them a great
many civilians, whom it regarded as potential enemies of the new regime. After
the war all information relating to these events and all witness accounts were
subject to censorship, books published abroad were confiscated by the police at
the border, and anyone who had the courage to address these issues in public
often ended up in court accused of spreading „mendacious hostile propaganda“.
Even though the truth finally came to light in the mid-1970s,
thanks to dissident writers such as the former resistance figher, the Christian
Socialist Edvard Kocbek, and in spite of the fact that following the end of
communism Slovene public opinion had to face up to the facts, the Slovenian „unburied
dead“ continue to traumatize Slovene society, constituting its dark collective
subconscious. And although the „hidden legacy“ has now been „illuminated“ from
many angles, its horror remains a taboo of which we are reluctant to speak
in public. Even the Slovene Parliament failed miserably, showing itself
incapable of taking a firm position in this matter despite a great
effort. The last time parliament failed was when it tried to take a decision
on the commemorative plaques – the sites of mass murders should at the very
least be commemorated by civilized, honest words that reflect the truth. Yet parliament
opted for an opaque set of words that disguise the facts rather than
revealing them: „Victims of the war and post-war murders.“ Murders – as if these were common
crimes rather than a meticulously planned, organized and implemented
political massacre. And so this
great trauma of Slovene history remains in the political subconscious and in terms
of political discourse it has never moved beyond the confines of literature. After
all, Slovenian theatregoers had
detected the hidden truth in Dominik Smola’s play „Antigone“ and whispered
about it well before Kocbek’s revelations.
It its true that members of the Slovenian territorial
army, notorious nationalists and anticommunists, were driven by their
opposition to communism to collaborating with the German occupying forces
during the war. Many would have
deserved to be prosecuted and punished. But those of us who claim allegiance to the anti-Fascist and
resistance tradition cannot accept the pointless and horrible belief, still
surviving in a part of Slovenian society, that the murdered ones received „just“
punishment. As early as in the 1970s, after Edvard Kocbek was almost lynched
for having publicly spoken about these horrific events and expressing a very
public remorse, the Nobel Prize winner Heinrich Böll said in Kocbek‘s defence
that nothing can justify unlawfully committed mass murder. Even as they were
being committed, the killings of civilians and members of anti-resistance units
without proper legal proceedings were a deplorable and unlawful act that
violated fundamental laws of civilized nations, laws that include the
principles of legal responsibility and criminal legislation. The communist
leadership regarded army members and civilians, detained in prisons and
concentration camps, as either collaborators and traitors or potential political
opponents, who could have jeopardized the process of consolidating the new
power and the revolutionary process that was just getting underway in a very
tense international situation and under difficult circumstances. In spite of
this political attitude the post-war massacres represent a grave criminal
offence from the legal point of view and a brutal crime from the
moral point of view; in national
and social terms they sowed the seeds of deep fear and engendered moral traumas
that have divided and branded future generations. Acts for which the then
leadership of the communist party was responsible tormented the conscience of
many members of the resistance who were innocent – many communists, Christian Socialists,
artists and everyone else who did not take part in these post-war actions and
had, driven by patriotism, bravely joined the wartime resistance.
That is why in Slovenia Wajda’s „Katyń" touched an open wound of Slovene historical memory and that is why – unsurprisingly – it ended up being shrouded in silence once again. Soon after the screening a new Katyń tragedy near Smolensk overshadowed all questions relating to the significance of these events, the horror of the pointless deaths and of 20th century ideological madness. „Katyń“ did not make anyone think of Srebrenica, a place on the margins of enlightened Europe, the Europe of human rights and freedom, where at the end of the past century another kind of nationalistic madness killed thousands of people and tried to hide the massacres from the eyes of world public opinion.
Even after the showing of Wajda’s film an unseen Antigone
keeps wandering around Slovenia trying to bury her murdered brother. And not
just around Slovenia.
pošli do vybrali.sme.sk |
Facebook| Po | Ut | St | Št | Pi | So | Ne |
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| « jún » | « 2013 » | ||||||